<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chairmans Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog</link>
	<description>Giving MCRUA members and the public a voice on the Mid Cheshire Railway Lines.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Closing Metrolink Mosley Street stop &#8211; an improvement? &#8230;. by Mike Battman</title>
		<link>http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/2010/11/13/closing-metrolink-mosley-street-stop-an-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-1931</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Battman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/?p=2372#comment-1931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mosley Street stop officially closed with the last tram last night]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mosley Street stop officially closed with the last tram last night</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Train Running Performance returning to previous highs &#8230;. by Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/2012/06/10/train-running-performance-returning-to-previous-highs/comment-page-1/#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 11:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/?p=5199#comment-1922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand only booked workings need an actual path and an unscheduled working can sometimes run even when there is no official path.  At least that&#039;s the response I got when Arriva Trains Wales were able to divert a peak Llandudno time train through Stockport even though there are no paths available for Northern to operate a half-hourly peak time service to Chester.

There is a slight variation on the option Conductor suggests if the unit that should have done the Stockport-Chester can be sent to Piccadilly.  Two of the three units left at platform 5 at Piccadilly could be used for the 17:09 Chester service and the unit for the Stockport-Chester could be attached to the remaining one for the 17:23 Chinley via Hazel Grove service, giving a bit longer for the unit to reach Piccadilly.

Obviously the best solution is for the empty train to not run to Stockport if no guard is available.  What&#039;s actually the longest the unit could stay there if a guard is available but he/she misses the Alderley Edge service that the guard usually gets to Stockport? 

From the Northern Twitter feed it seems that some of the crew shortages are due to errors in the Rostering opposed to there actually being an insufficient number of crews.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand only booked workings need an actual path and an unscheduled working can sometimes run even when there is no official path.  At least that&#8217;s the response I got when Arriva Trains Wales were able to divert a peak Llandudno time train through Stockport even though there are no paths available for Northern to operate a half-hourly peak time service to Chester.</p>
<p>There is a slight variation on the option Conductor suggests if the unit that should have done the Stockport-Chester can be sent to Piccadilly.  Two of the three units left at platform 5 at Piccadilly could be used for the 17:09 Chester service and the unit for the Stockport-Chester could be attached to the remaining one for the 17:23 Chinley via Hazel Grove service, giving a bit longer for the unit to reach Piccadilly.</p>
<p>Obviously the best solution is for the empty train to not run to Stockport if no guard is available.  What&#8217;s actually the longest the unit could stay there if a guard is available but he/she misses the Alderley Edge service that the guard usually gets to Stockport? </p>
<p>From the Northern Twitter feed it seems that some of the crew shortages are due to errors in the Rostering opposed to there actually being an insufficient number of crews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Train Running Performance returning to previous highs &#8230;. by Conductor</title>
		<link>http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/2012/06/10/train-running-performance-returning-to-previous-highs/comment-page-1/#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>Conductor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/?p=5199#comment-1918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There isn&#039;t much you can do once the unit is on Platform 2. It&#039;s got to go somewhere as I&#039;m not sure that Stockport can handle &quot;permissive workings&quot;, i.e. trains coupling and uncoupling on the station. Even if it did Network Rail don&#039;t want Stockport been blocked with 2 car commuters units at evening peak.. 

Empties to Chester is the usual option. Although it has been known for trains to go onto the single line at Cheadle to reverse back into Stockport. Pathing is a major issue as we all know in peak time from Stockport to Manchester. I doubt that a path could be created to get the unit into Manchester for the 1707. There is also a severe lack of time too.

Sometimes the cancellation is preplanned before the unit has even left Newton Heath because there is always a chance that train crew can be found last minute which does frequently happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There isn&#8217;t much you can do once the unit is on Platform 2. It&#8217;s got to go somewhere as I&#8217;m not sure that Stockport can handle &#8220;permissive workings&#8221;, i.e. trains coupling and uncoupling on the station. Even if it did Network Rail don&#8217;t want Stockport been blocked with 2 car commuters units at evening peak.. </p>
<p>Empties to Chester is the usual option. Although it has been known for trains to go onto the single line at Cheadle to reverse back into Stockport. Pathing is a major issue as we all know in peak time from Stockport to Manchester. I doubt that a path could be created to get the unit into Manchester for the 1707. There is also a severe lack of time too.</p>
<p>Sometimes the cancellation is preplanned before the unit has even left Newton Heath because there is always a chance that train crew can be found last minute which does frequently happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Train Running Performance returning to previous highs &#8230;. by Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/2012/06/10/train-running-performance-returning-to-previous-highs/comment-page-1/#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 18:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/?p=5199#comment-1917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve noticed quite a few occasions recently a service has been delayed or cancelled due to a train fault and it seems to be a class 142 Pacer each time.  Although, I&#039;ve also noticed that there seems to be more Pacers appearing on services which were usually operated by Sprinters - the 16:58 Stockport to Chester is a good example of this.  

The 16:58 Stockport to Chester is also a good example of a service which gets quite a few cancellations due to crew shortages.  To make matters worse if it&#039;s a conductor shortage the train can actually turn up at platform 2 at Stockport and then leave the platform at the correct time not-in-service and run empty towards Northenden, so the train is being wasted rather than being available to strengthen another service or to fill in for a failed train elsewhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed quite a few occasions recently a service has been delayed or cancelled due to a train fault and it seems to be a class 142 Pacer each time.  Although, I&#8217;ve also noticed that there seems to be more Pacers appearing on services which were usually operated by Sprinters &#8211; the 16:58 Stockport to Chester is a good example of this.  </p>
<p>The 16:58 Stockport to Chester is also a good example of a service which gets quite a few cancellations due to crew shortages.  To make matters worse if it&#8217;s a conductor shortage the train can actually turn up at platform 2 at Stockport and then leave the platform at the correct time not-in-service and run empty towards Northenden, so the train is being wasted rather than being available to strengthen another service or to fill in for a failed train elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fare dodging not helping overcrowding &#8230;. by Edd</title>
		<link>http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/2012/03/16/fare-dodging-not-helping-overcrowding/comment-page-1/#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>Edd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/?p=4440#comment-1915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geoff Kerr - Huddersfield already has manual ticket barriers.  I&#039;m not sure about the pub but there&#039;s a major flaw with the current system - the manual barriers are between the entrance for the ticket office and the exit for the ticket office.  This means people who go to a ticket window can then enter the station unchecked, while people who go to the ticket office to buy an Advance ticket have to exit through the manual barriers.

I&#039;ve purchased print@home tickets for use on trains in Spain, Italy and Germany and each time have printed them on A4 paper and this has never caused an issue as there weren&#039;t any ticket barriers in the way.  Also unlike UK tickets you can get print@home tickets without being restricted to a specific train or requiring a seat reservation with ticket inspectors either using a hand held gadget or asking for identification to prevent ticket misuse.  

While automated ticket barriers are used in some EU countries they seem to be restricted to commuter and underground services e.g. the RER and Metro in Paris.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff Kerr &#8211; Huddersfield already has manual ticket barriers.  I&#8217;m not sure about the pub but there&#8217;s a major flaw with the current system &#8211; the manual barriers are between the entrance for the ticket office and the exit for the ticket office.  This means people who go to a ticket window can then enter the station unchecked, while people who go to the ticket office to buy an Advance ticket have to exit through the manual barriers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve purchased print@home tickets for use on trains in Spain, Italy and Germany and each time have printed them on A4 paper and this has never caused an issue as there weren&#8217;t any ticket barriers in the way.  Also unlike UK tickets you can get print@home tickets without being restricted to a specific train or requiring a seat reservation with ticket inspectors either using a hand held gadget or asking for identification to prevent ticket misuse.  </p>
<p>While automated ticket barriers are used in some EU countries they seem to be restricted to commuter and underground services e.g. the RER and Metro in Paris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fare dodging not helping overcrowding &#8230;. by Geoff Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/2012/03/16/fare-dodging-not-helping-overcrowding/comment-page-1/#comment-1914</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 10:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/?p=4440#comment-1914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many problems with ticket gates, the main one being that they only protect the minimum fare, e.g. Leeds to Bramley. They do not accept various types of on-line tickets or passes, so that gates have to be manned at all times, or left open where they is no staff. And of course many tickets are valid only on specific trains and barriers checks do nothing to enforce this.

But the most serious problem is the lack of access to non rail-users - &quot;meeters and greeters&quot;, rail enthusiasts or those just wanting to use retail facilities. Huddersfield, Dewsbury and Sheffield stations all have well-known pubs which have access from both the street and the platform. Huddersfield is having gates installed. Does this mean that the pub doors onto the platform will remain locked? If so, this will mean loss of income from passengers changing trains and wanting to pop in for a pint as they will have to exit via the gates, making a &quot;break of journey&quot; - and not all tickets allow this. If gates are to become widespread, then we MUST have platform tickets as we did in the past before British Rail introduced their &quot;open station&quot; policy which, if I recall, was to save staffing costs and elininate the duplication of retail facilities!

Most of the rest of Europe follows an &quot;open station&quot; policy and no doubt they have effective ways of collecting their revenue, i.e. more effective enforcement on the trains backed up by spot checks on the platform at peak times. 

Geoff Kerr
Todmorden]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many problems with ticket gates, the main one being that they only protect the minimum fare, e.g. Leeds to Bramley. They do not accept various types of on-line tickets or passes, so that gates have to be manned at all times, or left open where they is no staff. And of course many tickets are valid only on specific trains and barriers checks do nothing to enforce this.</p>
<p>But the most serious problem is the lack of access to non rail-users &#8211; &#8220;meeters and greeters&#8221;, rail enthusiasts or those just wanting to use retail facilities. Huddersfield, Dewsbury and Sheffield stations all have well-known pubs which have access from both the street and the platform. Huddersfield is having gates installed. Does this mean that the pub doors onto the platform will remain locked? If so, this will mean loss of income from passengers changing trains and wanting to pop in for a pint as they will have to exit via the gates, making a &#8220;break of journey&#8221; &#8211; and not all tickets allow this. If gates are to become widespread, then we MUST have platform tickets as we did in the past before British Rail introduced their &#8220;open station&#8221; policy which, if I recall, was to save staffing costs and elininate the duplication of retail facilities!</p>
<p>Most of the rest of Europe follows an &#8220;open station&#8221; policy and no doubt they have effective ways of collecting their revenue, i.e. more effective enforcement on the trains backed up by spot checks on the platform at peak times. </p>
<p>Geoff Kerr<br />
Todmorden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Train Running Performance returning to previous highs &#8230;. by The Chairman</title>
		<link>http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/2012/06/10/train-running-performance-returning-to-previous-highs/comment-page-1/#comment-1913</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chairman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 11:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/?p=5199#comment-1913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve added the Performance figures above up to the end of the Railway&#039;s financial year of 31 March 2013.

The bad news is that our PPM has dropped a further percentage point to 87.83%, the worst for well over 4 years.  There also seems to be a worrying trend of traincrew shortages increasing.

The good news is that (at last!) we have the extra 3 minutes SRT dwell times requested coming into the timetable from 19 May, though not for all Chester-bound trains.  Given that the SRT issues are making up around 25% of incidents, from 2013/14 Period 3 we should see the PPM starting to climb again back towards the 91.57% it was in February 2011.

Since we&#039;re now into a new Railway financial year, I&#039;ll start a new Blog post for the next set of figures.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve added the Performance figures above up to the end of the Railway&#8217;s financial year of 31 March 2013.</p>
<p>The bad news is that our PPM has dropped a further percentage point to 87.83%, the worst for well over 4 years.  There also seems to be a worrying trend of traincrew shortages increasing.</p>
<p>The good news is that (at last!) we have the extra 3 minutes SRT dwell times requested coming into the timetable from 19 May, though not for all Chester-bound trains.  Given that the SRT issues are making up around 25% of incidents, from 2013/14 Period 3 we should see the PPM starting to climb again back towards the 91.57% it was in February 2011.</p>
<p>Since we&#8217;re now into a new Railway financial year, I&#8217;ll start a new Blog post for the next set of figures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mid Cheshire Minor Timetable Changes from 9 December 2012 &#8230;. by Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/2012/11/14/mid-cheshire-minor-timetable-changes-from-9-december-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/?p=6072#comment-1909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Relating to Sunday services I&#039;ve just seen the following on the Cycletta Cheshire website relating to getting to an event on Sunday 7th October starting at 9am

&quot;TRAVEL BY PUBLIC TRANSPORT: Knutsford Railway Station is situated approximately half a mile from the Knutsford entrance to Tatton Park. You can walk in through the main gates and down the estate drive (2 miles from the Station) to the Cycletta Village and event start area. Unfortunately the earliest train arriving at Knutsford Station gets in too late to start the event but any spectators looking to arrive after the event starts could use this option.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relating to Sunday services I&#8217;ve just seen the following on the Cycletta Cheshire website relating to getting to an event on Sunday 7th October starting at 9am</p>
<p>&#8220;TRAVEL BY PUBLIC TRANSPORT: Knutsford Railway Station is situated approximately half a mile from the Knutsford entrance to Tatton Park. You can walk in through the main gates and down the estate drive (2 miles from the Station) to the Cycletta Village and event start area. Unfortunately the earliest train arriving at Knutsford Station gets in too late to start the event but any spectators looking to arrive after the event starts could use this option.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mid Cheshire Passenger Counts &#8211; Interim January 2013 Report &#8230;. by Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/2013/02/24/mid-cheshire-passenger-counts-interim-january-2013-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1904</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 10:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/?p=6570#comment-1904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure if anyone was on the 17:07 Chester-Manchester counting passengers yesterday (Monday 6th) but that looked to have a crush loading leaving Knutsford.  The 17:09 Manchester-Chester that I was on wasn&#039;t too bad considering the 16:58 Stockport-Chester service was cancelled due to no guard being available.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if anyone was on the 17:07 Chester-Manchester counting passengers yesterday (Monday 6th) but that looked to have a crush loading leaving Knutsford.  The 17:09 Manchester-Chester that I was on wasn&#8217;t too bad considering the 16:58 Stockport-Chester service was cancelled due to no guard being available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mad Dog MCREA! &#8230;. by railofficer</title>
		<link>http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/2013/05/02/mad-dog-mcrea/comment-page-1/#comment-1902</link>
		<dc:creator>railofficer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcrua.org.uk/chairmansblog/?p=6705#comment-1902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This should be an excellent summer, musical night out - and so easy to leave the car behind and go by train. But best of all - proceeds are helping Ugandaid projects.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be an excellent summer, musical night out &#8211; and so easy to leave the car behind and go by train. But best of all &#8211; proceeds are helping Ugandaid projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
